Episode 21: Neobroker Psychology and the Future of Digital Financial Knowledge

Show notes

In this episode we will be discussing the paper written by Professor Dr. Mike Friedrichsen and Justin Ugwu. This paper dives into an analysis of the way neobrokers are affecting the transformation of the architecture of financial markets for a new generation of young, digitally savvy investors.

Show transcript

00:00:10: Welcome back to the Deep Dive, where we take the source material you share with us and distill it into genuine knowledge and insight.

00:00:16: Today,

00:00:17: we're not talking macroeconomics or central banking.

00:00:19: No, we're going deep into the psychology of investing, specifically this highly digitized app-based world of neobrokers.

00:00:28: Yeah.

00:00:30: Okay, let's unpack this.

00:00:31: Platforms like, you know, Trade Republic or Scalable Capital has just completely upended traditional finance.

00:00:38: Oh, completely.

00:00:39: I mean, investing used to require a meeting, a consultation, maybe even a blazer.

00:00:43: Right.

00:00:44: Now, that barrier to entry has, well, it's basically evaporated.

00:00:47: You can open an account with a quick video ID check.

00:00:49: In minutes.

00:00:50: Buy a stock or an EPF in seconds and trade almost around the clock and for like virtually no fee.

00:00:56: And that transformation is the exact focus of the research we're exploring today.

00:01:00: It comes out of the German University of Digital Science.

00:01:02: We'll

00:01:02: call it German UDS for short.

00:01:04: Yeah, and they frame this whole shift as a kind of collision.

00:01:08: You have the rigid quantitative logic of financial markets running headlong into messy, impulsive human decision-making.

00:01:16: So the core question they're asking is, when access is this easy and data is just pushed to you constantly through an app, does that make this new investor more rational?

00:01:27: More informed?

00:01:28: or does it do the opposite?

00:01:29: Are they just being driven by emotion by short-term signals and by impulse

00:01:34: things that are often amplified and Intensified by the apps design itself?

00:01:40: exactly the evidence really suggests that for a lot of people capital market participation has stopped being a planned Long-term investment process

00:01:48: and it's become what it's become just another form of digital interaction You know embedded right alongside checking Instagram or scrolling through your newsfeed.

00:01:56: And

00:01:56: I imagine that shift in behavior really depends on who is using these platforms.

00:02:01: The study isolated a very specific user segment, didn't it?

00:02:05: The fascinating one, yeah.

00:02:06: This is not your classic long-term fund manager or someone planning for retirement thirty years from now.

00:02:11: Right.

00:02:12: The profile of the Neobroker user is distinctly younger and less financially established.

00:02:18: Three-quarters of the people they surveyed were between eighteen and thirty-four.

00:02:21: Wow, that's a huge majority.

00:02:23: It is.

00:02:23: And two-thirds were actually still in education or studying.

00:02:27: So we're talking about people who are highly digital savvy.

00:02:30: They're comfortable with the tech.

00:02:32: For sure.

00:02:32: But they're also typically managing much smaller depot volumes, often well under the twenty thousand euro mark.

00:02:40: They are, in the studies terms, small private investors.

00:02:43: And

00:02:44: often working with a limited financial buffer.

00:02:46: The

00:02:46: very limited one.

00:02:47: But despite that.

00:02:49: The sources point to this incredible appetite for risk.

00:02:52: A

00:02:52: huge appetite.

00:02:53: There's a pronounced willingness to experiment, which you see in their above-average use of really speculative stuff derivatives, cryptocurrencies.

00:03:01: That feels like a contradiction.

00:03:03: Small resources, but high risk.

00:03:05: It is a contradiction, but it's one that's kind of rooted in the accessibility these platforms offer.

00:03:10: See, Neo Brokers didn't just get rid of high fees.

00:03:12: They changed the whole game.

00:03:13: They

00:03:14: fundamentally changed the logic of trading.

00:03:16: They replaced the, you know, the slow, deliberate actions of traditional banking with the quick, effortless actions we use for social media.

00:03:24: Swiping, tapping.

00:03:26: Exactly.

00:03:27: The systems translate the act of investing into pure app logic.

00:03:31: swiping, tapping, and those permanent push notifications.

00:03:34: So instead of a big weighty decision to call your advisor for a fifty thousand dollar trade,

00:03:39: you're just tapping a button on your phone for a fifty dollar trade.

00:03:42: That transformation makes what should be a slow, long-term process into this streamlined, high-frequency interaction.

00:03:50: It changes the cognitive weight of the decision.

00:03:52: It absolutely does.

00:03:54: It sounds like the environment is almost structurally setting people up for short-term, impulse-driven thinking, no matter what their stated goals

00:04:02: are.

00:04:02: That's a great way to put it.

00:04:03: And it's reinforced by the design choices themselves.

00:04:06: The things that actively blur the line between serious investing and just, you know, interacting with your screen.

00:04:11: You mean the gamification.

00:04:12: Absolutely.

00:04:13: The low barrier to entry is constantly reinforced by what the study calls gamification elements.

00:04:19: Think about the positive reinforcement loop.

00:04:21: The little dopamine hits.

00:04:23: Yes.

00:04:24: When you make a successful trade, you often get like color highlights, maybe even a little confetti animation.

00:04:30: These ranking aesthetics, the simplified interfaces.

00:04:33: They're designed to feel good.

00:04:34: Right.

00:04:35: It's giving you the rush you get from beating a level in a game, not the sober satisfaction of compounding interest over thirty years.

00:04:42: It activates that immediate reward mechanism, and then the constant push notifications create the structural pressure, this feeling that you need to check and react immediately.

00:04:52: It turns your financial decisions into just another part of the attention economy.

00:04:56: That's the fascinating consequence.

00:04:58: The stock market stops being this detached system of financial fundamentals, you know, PE ratios, balance sheets, and it becomes another feed on your smartphone.

00:05:07: Competing with everything else for your attention.

00:05:09: And it demands an emotional response, either fear or euphoria.

00:05:13: In this context, price movements don't feel like complex market shifts.

00:05:17: They feel like new posts.

00:05:18: you have to check.

00:05:19: Exactly.

00:05:20: And suddenly, financial decision-making is integrated into this world where attention, emotion, and the button to make an immediate transaction are all tightly intertwined.

00:05:30: You move from analysis to reflex.

00:05:32: Perfectly set.

00:05:33: That's a powerful idea.

00:05:34: It's turning long-term asset management into a reactive performance.

00:05:39: And this high-frequency emotional environment is exactly what behavioral finance has been warning us about for decades.

00:05:46: Here's where it gets really interesting.

00:05:48: The German UDS researchers focus on four core behavioral biases, analyzing how these cognitive and emotional factors really shaped decision-making in these hyper-digital environments.

00:05:59: Yeah, and their methodology was pretty direct.

00:06:01: They used a quantitative online survey of a hundred and sixty-two active neo-broker users.

00:06:06: And they asked them about their self-perception and also gave them hypothetical scenarios, right?

00:06:10: Like, what would you do with a thirty-five percent profit or a thirty percent loss?

00:06:13: They did, and the findings revealed these really systematic patterns of irrational that are just significantly amplified by the platform environment.

00:06:22: Let's start with the first one, overconfidence.

00:06:24: The study found that a massive portion of these users just significantly overestimates their own stock market knowledge and the quality of their decisions.

00:06:33: I would have thought the easy access to data would foster some humility, you know, seeing how much you don't know, but the research suggests the opposite.

00:06:41: It does.

00:06:41: They believe they can achieve above average results.

00:06:44: even when their objective situation like lack of experience or a small undiversified portfolio doesn't support that at all.

00:06:52: So it's a feeling of control.

00:06:53: Precisely.

00:06:54: And what was really illuminating is that their self-certainty was even higher when they were responding to concrete hypothetical scenarios compared to just abstract self-assessment.

00:07:03: So when they imagine themselves in the action, they feel more confident.

00:07:07: Yes.

00:07:07: The platform encourages this.

00:07:09: Those quick, successful trades reinforced by the confetti strengthen that feeling of, I've got this under control.

00:07:16: It's the classic pattern.

00:07:17: I nailed that last trade.

00:07:18: Therefore, I'm a genius.

00:07:20: OK, what's next?

00:07:20: Bias number two, loss aversion.

00:07:23: We know losses hurt more than equivalent gains.

00:07:25: feel good.

00:07:26: How did that show up in the data?

00:07:28: Oh,

00:07:28: it was a very clear finding.

00:07:30: The majority of users found it extremely difficult to sell positions that were losing money.

00:07:35: They just can't bring themselves to click the button.

00:07:37: They're unwilling to realize the loss.

00:07:39: Instead, they just hold onto what the sources call red positions, hoping for a recovery, even when there's no fundamental reason for one.

00:07:47: and that has real financial consequences.

00:07:49: Profound

00:07:50: ones.

00:07:51: That capital stays tied up in low-prospect investments.

00:07:54: This drastically increases their opportunity costs, you know, the money they could have made elsewhere, and it just hammers their long-term returns.

00:08:02: It's a self-inflicted penalty driven purely by the psychological pain of admitting a mistake.

00:08:07: Exactly.

00:08:08: And then we move to a truly modern bias, one that's just so amplified by the digital age, regret aversion and FOMO, the fear of missing out.

00:08:17: Yeah, this one is huge.

00:08:18: Decisions are so often shaped by the memory of missed opportunities.

00:08:22: A frequently cited lament among users was not having invested more previously.

00:08:27: If only I'd bought more of that stock when it was lower.

00:08:29: That's

00:08:29: the one.

00:08:30: And if you're trading in isolation, that regret is internal.

00:08:35: But when you couple it with the External noise of social media hype, success stories, all that stuff.

00:08:41: FOMO

00:08:41: becomes structurally embedded.

00:08:43: You're not just comparing yourself to the market anymore.

00:08:45: You're comparing yourself to the millions of success stories in your feed.

00:08:49: So you're making decisions not based on a reflective strategy.

00:08:52: No, you're making them based on the overwhelming fear of being too late.

00:08:56: It's a deeply emotional state that drives impulsive buying, especially into assets that are already really volatile.

00:09:03: And the last one was the recency effect.

00:09:06: We know people tend to overweight recent events.

00:09:09: How does the Neo Broker world magnify this?

00:09:11: It radically transforms it.

00:09:13: Traditionally, you might get the last big piece of news in a newspaper or on TV.

00:09:18: Now it's a constant stream of high frequency signal.

00:09:21: Alerts,

00:09:22: pushes, social posts.

00:09:23: All designed to be immediate.

00:09:24: This perpetual immediacy just ensures that the very latest price move, the freshest social media post, is disproportionately present in your mind.

00:09:32: And

00:09:32: the long-term trends and fundamental data just get pushed to the background.

00:09:36: They can't compete.

00:09:37: They just can't compete with the instant fear or satisfaction of a flashing red or green notification.

00:09:44: This combination of amplified biases leads to the core contradiction that the German UDS study highlighted, right?

00:09:51: The gap between what people say they do and what they actually do.

00:09:56: Yes, there's a huge cognitive dissonance there.

00:09:59: Users will strategically state they are long-term investors.

00:10:02: You know, I hold my positions for years.

00:10:04: I have a low trade frequency.

00:10:05: The

00:10:05: definition of rational investing.

00:10:07: Exactly.

00:10:08: However, their monitoring behavior is anything but long-term.

00:10:12: They check their portfolios, constantly during periods of strong market movement, whether it's gains or losses.

00:10:17: So the long-term argument is a kind of rational self-description.

00:10:20: I'm a rational investor, I'm just looking at my app.

00:10:23: But the short-term emotions.

00:10:24: Fear,

00:10:25: joy, FOMO.

00:10:26: Those are what control the actual behavior, the constant monitoring, the readiness to act.

00:10:31: We can connect this directly back to Kahneman's dual process model.

00:10:34: System one is fast, intuitive, emotional.

00:10:37: System two is slow, rational, analytical.

00:10:40: In the Neo Broker world, System One is constantly being activated by the app's design, by the push notifications.

00:10:47: So the emotional system is always on.

00:10:48: Always.

00:10:49: The decision to buy or sell is often prepared first by that fast system, and it's only justified after the fact by the slow, rational system too.

00:10:59: So System One screams, by now it's going to the moon.

00:11:02: While you're waiting for the bus, yeah.

00:11:04: And System Two only kicks in hours later to try and find a legitimate long-term justification for that impulsive purchase you already made.

00:11:12: And social media is just pouring fuel on that.

00:11:14: System One fire.

00:11:15: Absolutely.

00:11:16: These platforms have replaced traditional media as the key source for market sentiment.

00:11:21: Information's relevance isn't defined by financial depth or neutrality anymore.

00:11:26: It's defined by visibility, reach, and emotional engagement.

00:11:29: Right.

00:11:29: Social platforms are structurally designed to reward emotionalization over nuance.

00:11:33: So the algorithms push the extreme content.

00:11:35: the

00:11:36: pure euphoria of to the moon or the star fear of the crash is coming tomorrow.

00:11:41: Balanced nuanced perspectives on risk management.

00:11:43: just don't get the same airtime.

00:11:45: Which just amplifies all the biases we just talked about.

00:11:47: Traumatically.

00:11:49: Overconfidence is fueled by simple success stories and FOMO is magnified by social comparison.

00:11:56: It turns trading into a spectator sport where everyone else seems to be winning.

00:12:00: So what does this all mean?

00:12:02: The study put the huge emphasis on the dilemma of Eigenverint warding self-responsibility.

00:12:08: It's a huge paradox.

00:12:10: Most neo-broker users strongly reject traditional financial advice.

00:12:14: They cite high costs, mistrust, or just a deep desire for self-control.

00:12:19: They want autonomy.

00:12:20: They demand it.

00:12:21: Yet this autonomous self-image clashes directly with the evidence showing how vulnerable they are to these psychological biases.

00:12:27: A vulnerability they tend to overlook, right, since they rate their own knowledge as average to good.

00:12:33: they systematically overestimate their actual competence.

00:12:36: And this leads to something the researchers call performative inequality.

00:12:40: The opportunity to do it yourself isn't neutral.

00:12:44: It doesn't put everyone on an equal footing.

00:12:45: That's

00:12:45: such a key point.

00:12:46: If you recognize and actively compensate for these biases, maybe through diversification, setting clear rules for yourself, or even just a conscious information diet, you have a much better chance of building wealth.

00:12:58: You're using your freedom but also your reflection to protect yourself.

00:13:02: But if you don't see these structural mechanisms and emotional traps,

00:13:06: you pay the cost in lost returns and unnecessary risk despite having the exact same digital tools as the savvy investor.

00:13:14: It's like giving everyone a professional kitchen but only teaching half of them how to read a recipe.

00:13:18: The ones who understand the science perform better.

00:13:22: The ones who rely on impulse.

00:13:23: pay the price.

00:13:24: And for that reason, the research concludes that digital financial education needs to be completely redefined.

00:13:30: It has to move beyond just explaining products, what an ETF is, how to open a depot.

00:13:35: It has to become a core part of digital literacy itself.

00:13:38: Exactly.

00:13:39: The focus has to shift to training the ability to recognize, to classify, and to limit these psychological mechanisms like overconfidence and FOMO.

00:13:48: So if the apps are amplifying the logic of the fast click,

00:13:51: Then education must deliberately work at a slower pace.

00:13:55: It needs to use simulations and reflection to show how short-term reactions, like panic selling, drastically change your long-term risk profile.

00:14:03: Creating reflective distance from the digital environment.

00:14:07: That's the goal.

00:14:07: Ultimately, this study shows us that neobrokers are so much more than just a modern sales channel.

00:14:14: They're what the researchers call a laboratory of digital decision worlds.

00:14:19: They're the place where the promise of individual freedom crashes right into these structurally reinforced behavioral biases.

00:14:27: And

00:14:27: where efficiency often comes at the direct expense of reflection.

00:14:30: It's a necessary wake-up call for anyone.

00:14:33: who uses these platforms.

00:14:34: And that leads us to the final provocative thought for you to consider today.

00:14:38: Digital sovereignty in the twenty-first century isn't just about having access to the tools of capital management.

00:14:44: It's about the ability to understand their inherent logics and to consciously choose not to follow them blindly.

00:14:50: The real challenge then.

00:14:52: The real challenge for the modern investor is balancing that efficiency and reflection, freedom and protection in these highly digitized environments every single day.

New comment

Your name or nickname, will be shown publicly
At least 10 characters long
By submitting your comment you agree that the content of the field "Name or nickname" will be stored and shown publicly next to your comment. Using your real name is optional.